feat(core): rank resolutions in the score

`resolution_pref` only gated eligibility, so every release was scored
against its own resolution's size band and a 23 GB 4K lost to an
at-target 1080p. Each step up the list is now worth `resolution_step`
points, seeded at 300: five gibibytes of 4K overshoot, so a 4K up to
27 GB wins and a bloated one still does not.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

DESIGN.md

@@ -261,6 +261,25 @@ tiebreaker. Seeders are log-scaled and small: enough to complete, past that it
 does not matter. Telesync, CAM and screener are **hard filters**, not low
 scores.
 
+**How resolutions rank against each other.** Size is scored against the band
+for the release's own resolution, so on its own it says nothing across
+resolutions: an at-target 4K and an at-target 1080p both score the top of the
+size term, and a 4K a couple of gigabytes over target loses to a 1080p that is
+merely on target. That is wrong — `resolution_pref` is an ordered list, and the
+order is a preference, not just an eligibility filter.
+
+So each step up `resolution_pref` is worth a fixed number of points. The last
+entry is worth nothing and every earlier one a step more. A resolution the list
+does not carry scores nothing rather than being penalised, the same as an
+unclaimed resolution: no ranking is no opinion.
+
+The step is sized against the size term, not chosen in isolation. With the
+seeded 4K band — target 22 GB, 60 points per gigabyte over — a step of 300 is
+five gigabytes of overshoot: a 4K up to about 27 GB beats an at-target 1080p,
+and a bloated 40 GB 4K does not. Below target the same arithmetic asks a 4K to
+be within about four gigabytes of its target to win, which is what keeps an 8 GB
+4K that looks like mud from beating a good 1080p.
+
 Exact numbers are policy rows, tuned by hand. The model is the decision.
 
 ### 5.6 Two phases of truth

crates/arr-api/src/search.rs

@@ -59,6 +59,23 @@ pub struct TmdbMovie {
     pub poster_path: Option<String>,
 }
 
+/// One release's score, kept as its terms so the UI can explain a ranking
+/// (`DESIGN.md` §5.5) rather than showing a bare number.
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Default, Serialize, ToSchema)]
+pub struct ScoreTerms {
+    /// Distance from the target size for this release's own resolution.
+    /// Zero when the release carries no size, or the policy no band for it.
+    pub size: i64,
+    /// The source-tier tiebreaker.
+    pub source: i64,
+    /// The log-scaled seeder term.
+    pub seeders: i64,
+    /// Where the release sits in the policy's resolution preference. This is
+    /// what makes a 4K release outrank a 1080p one that scores the same
+    /// against its own size band.
+    pub resolution: i64,
+}
+
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, ToSchema)]
 pub struct ClassifiedRelease {
     pub indexer_id: i64,
@@ -70,6 +87,8 @@ pub struct ClassifiedRelease {
     pub download_url: String,
     pub parsed: serde_json::Value,
     pub score: i64,
+    /// `score` broken into the terms that produced it.
+    pub score_terms: ScoreTerms,
     pub verdict: String,
     pub rule: Option<String>,
 }
@@ -487,11 +506,24 @@ fn classify(
         release.size.unwrap_or_default(),
         release.seeders.unwrap_or_default(),
     );
-    let score = if release.size.is_some() {
+    // A release with no size has nothing to say about its size band, so that
-        score.total
+    // term is dropped rather than scored as if it were at the floor. Every
-    } else {
+    // other term still stands — the resolution rank comes from the name.
-        score.source.saturating_add(score.seeders)
+    let terms = ScoreTerms {
+        size: if release.size.is_some() {
+            score.size
+        } else {
+            0
+        },
+        source: score.source,
+        seeders: score.seeders,
+        resolution: score.resolution,
     };
+    let score = terms
+        .size
+        .saturating_add(terms.source)
+        .saturating_add(terms.seeders)
+        .saturating_add(terms.resolution);
     Ok(ClassifiedRelease {
         indexer_id: release.indexer_id,
         guid: release.guid,
@@ -509,6 +541,7 @@ fn classify(
         parsed: serde_json::to_value(parsed)
             .map_err(|error| ApiError::Database(error.to_string()))?,
         score,
+        score_terms: terms,
         verdict: verdict.to_owned(),
         rule,
     })
@@ -681,7 +714,7 @@ mod tests {
         sqlx::query("INSERT INTO movies (tmdb_id, title, year, original_language, root_id) VALUES (693134, 'Dune Part Two', 2024, 'en', 2)")
             .execute(state.database().expect("database").pool()).await.expect("movie");
         sqlx::query(
-            "UPDATE policies SET score_weights = '{\"size_at_target\":0,\"source_tier\":0,\"seeder_doubling\":0}'",
+            "UPDATE policies SET score_weights = '{\"size_at_target\":0,\"source_tier\":0,\"seeder_doubling\":0,\"resolution_step\":0}'",
         )
         .execute(state.database().expect("database").pool())
         .await
@@ -801,6 +834,88 @@ mod tests {
         }
     }
 
+    /// Issue #113: the breakdown is what the UI explains a ranking from, so
+    /// the resolution term has to be visible in it, not folded into a total.
+    #[test]
+    fn the_score_breakdown_carries_the_resolution_term() {
+        let policy = scoring_policy();
+        let classify_at = |name: &str, size: u64| {
+            let release = SearchRelease {
+                indexer_id: 1,
+                guid: name.into(),
+                name: name.into(),
+                size: Some(size),
+                seeders: Some(20),
+                publish_date: None,
+                download_url: "https://tracker/release".into(),
+                tmdb_id: None,
+                imdb_id: None,
+            };
+            classify(
+                release,
+                &policy,
+                &TitleOverrides::default(),
+                &Language::Other("en".into()),
+                &Blacklist::default(),
+            )
+            .expect("classified release")
+        };
+
+        let uhd = classify_at("Dune.Part.Two.2024.2160p.WEB-DL", 23 << 30);
+        let hd = classify_at("Dune.Part.Two.2024.1080p.WEB-DL", 8 << 30);
+
+        assert_eq!(
+            uhd.score_terms.resolution,
+            i64::from(policy.score_weights.resolution_step)
+        );
+        assert_eq!(hd.score_terms.resolution, 0);
+        // The 4K is over its own target and so scores worse on size, and
+        // still ranks first.
+        assert!(uhd.score_terms.size < hd.score_terms.size);
+        assert!(uhd.score > hd.score);
+        assert_eq!(
+            uhd.score,
+            uhd.score_terms.size
+                + uhd.score_terms.source
+                + uhd.score_terms.seeders
+                + uhd.score_terms.resolution
+        );
+    }
+
+    /// The seeded movie policy's scoring numbers (§5.5).
+    fn scoring_policy() -> Policy {
+        Policy {
+            id: PolicyId(1),
+            name: "test".into(),
+            required_audio: RequiredAudio::OriginalLanguage,
+            dub_blacklist: Vec::new(),
+            hdr_rules: HdrRules {
+                rejected_dolby_vision_profiles: Vec::new(),
+            },
+            size_bands: std::collections::BTreeMap::from([
+                (
+                    Resolution::R2160p,
+                    SizeBand {
+                        floor_bytes: 8 << 30,
+                        target_bytes: 22 << 30,
+                        penalty_points_per_gib_over: 60,
+                    },
+                ),
+                (
+                    Resolution::R1080p,
+                    SizeBand {
+                        floor_bytes: 3 << 30,
+                        target_bytes: 8 << 30,
+                        penalty_points_per_gib_over: 60,
+                    },
+                ),
+            ]),
+            resolution_preference: vec![Resolution::R2160p, Resolution::R1080p],
+            source_weights: std::collections::BTreeMap::from([(Source::WebDl, 2)]),
+            score_weights: ScoreWeights::default(),
+        }
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn releases_without_sizes_skip_the_size_score() {
         let policy = Policy {
@@ -848,8 +963,13 @@ mod tests {
 
         assert_eq!(
             classified.score,
-            core_score.source.saturating_add(core_score.seeders)
+            core_score
+                .source
+                .saturating_add(core_score.seeders)
+                .saturating_add(core_score.resolution)
         );
+        assert_eq!(classified.score_terms.size, 0);
+        assert_eq!(classified.score_terms.resolution, core_score.resolution);
         assert_ne!(classified.score, core_score.total);
     }
 

crates/arr-core/src/score.rs

@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@
 //! WEB-DL at target beats a 60 GB remux while the remux keeps a score and
 //! stays eligible — it wins when nothing smaller exists.
 //!
+//! Size is scored against the band for the release's own resolution, so it
+//! says nothing about how resolutions rank against each other. That is the
+//! resolution-rank term: the policy's `resolution_preference` is ordered, and
+//! each step up it is worth a fixed number of points.
+//!
 //! Below the floor is a hard filter rather than a low score, and lives in
 //! [`crate::policy::SizeRule`]: unbounded "smaller is better" would otherwise
 //! select a 3 GB 4K encode that looks like mud.
@@ -31,6 +36,18 @@ pub struct ScoreWeights {
     /// Points per doubling of the seeder count. Log-scaled and small —
     /// enough seeders to complete matters, past that it does not.
     pub seeder_doubling: i32,
+    /// Points per step up the policy's `resolution_preference`. The last
+    /// entry is worth nothing and each earlier one a step more, so the list
+    /// that already decides eligibility also decides how resolutions rank
+    /// against each other.
+    ///
+    /// Sized against the size term deliberately. With the seeded bands — 4K
+    /// target 22 GiB, 60 points per gibibyte over — 300 points is five
+    /// gibibytes of overshoot: a 4K release up to 27 GiB outranks an
+    /// at-target 1080p, and a bloated 4K past that does not. Below its
+    /// target a 4K has to be within about four gibibytes of it to win, which
+    /// keeps a mud-quality 8 GiB 4K from beating a good 1080p.
+    pub resolution_step: i32,
 }
 
 impl Default for ScoreWeights {
@@ -39,6 +56,7 @@ impl Default for ScoreWeights {
             size_at_target: 1000,
             source_tier: 25,
             seeder_doubling: 8,
+            resolution_step: 300,
         }
     }
 }
@@ -54,6 +72,10 @@ pub struct Score {
     pub source: i64,
     /// The log-scaled seeder term.
     pub seeders: i64,
+    /// The resolution-rank term: where the release sits in the policy's
+    /// `resolution_preference`. Zero when the name claims no resolution, or
+    /// claims one the policy does not rank.
+    pub resolution: i64,
 }
 
 /// Score a candidate against a policy.
@@ -61,23 +83,29 @@ pub struct Score {
 /// A candidate with no applicable size band — unknown resolution, or a
 /// resolution the policy carries no band for — scores zero on the dominant
 /// term rather than being penalised for what the release name failed to say.
+/// The resolution-rank term treats an unclaimed resolution the same way.
 #[must_use]
 pub fn score(policy: &Policy, candidate: Candidate<'_>, size_bytes: u64, seeders: u32) -> Score {
     let weights = &policy.score_weights;
-    let size = candidate
+    let claimed = candidate.resolution();
-        .resolution()
+    let size = claimed
         .and_then(|resolution| policy.size_bands.get(&resolution))
         .map_or(0, |band| size_points(band, weights, size_bytes));
     let source = candidate
         .source()
         .map_or(0, |source| source_points(policy, source));
     let seeders = seeder_points(weights, seeders);
+    let resolution = claimed.map_or(0, |resolution| resolution_points(policy, resolution));
 
     Score {
-        total: size.saturating_add(source).saturating_add(seeders),
+        total: size
+            .saturating_add(source)
+            .saturating_add(seeders)
+            .saturating_add(resolution),
         size,
         source,
         seeders,
+        resolution,
     }
 }
 
@@ -129,6 +157,24 @@ fn size_points(band: &SizeBand, weights: &ScoreWeights, size_bytes: u64) -> i64
     at_target.saturating_mul(size.saturating_sub(floor)) / span
 }
 
+/// The resolution-rank term (`DESIGN.md` §5.5). The policy's
+/// `resolution_preference` is an ordered list, so it says more than which
+/// resolutions are eligible: the last entry is worth nothing and every
+/// earlier one a step more, which is what makes a 4K release outrank a 1080p
+/// one that scores the same against its own size band.
+///
+/// A resolution the list does not carry is worth nothing rather than being
+/// penalised — it is already ineligible, and no ranking is no opinion.
+fn resolution_points(policy: &Policy, resolution: Resolution) -> i64 {
+    let preference = &policy.resolution_preference;
+    let Some(rank) = preference.iter().position(|entry| *entry == resolution) else {
+        return 0;
+    };
+    let steps = preference.len().saturating_sub(1).saturating_sub(rank);
+    i64::from(policy.score_weights.resolution_step)
+        .saturating_mul(i64::try_from(steps).unwrap_or(i64::MAX))
+}
+
 /// The source tiebreaker. A source the policy does not weight is worth
 /// nothing rather than being penalised.
 fn source_points(policy: &Policy, source: Source) -> i64 {
@@ -219,6 +265,21 @@ mod tests {
         score(&policy(), Candidate::PreGrab(&claims), size_bytes, seeders)
     }
 
+    /// The same, at a resolution the caller picks.
+    fn scored_at(
+        resolution: ClaimedResolution,
+        source: ClaimedSource,
+        size_bytes: u64,
+        seeders: u32,
+    ) -> Score {
+        let claims = NameClaims {
+            resolution: Some(resolution),
+            source: Some(source),
+            ..NameClaims::default()
+        };
+        score(&policy(), Candidate::PreGrab(&claims), size_bytes, seeders)
+    }
+
     fn size_rule(size_bytes: u64) -> RuleEvaluation {
         let policy = policy();
         let overrides = TitleOverrides::default();
@@ -362,4 +423,81 @@ mod tests {
         assert_eq!(at.size, i64::from(ScoreWeights::default().size_at_target));
         assert_eq!(under.size, 0);
     }
+
+    /// Issue #113, observed live: a 23 GB 4K release ranked below several
+    /// 1080p ones because each was scored against its own size band.
+    #[test]
+    fn a_slightly_over_target_4k_outranks_an_at_target_1080p() {
+        let uhd = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P2160, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(23), 20);
+        let hd = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P1080, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(8), 20);
+
+        assert!(uhd.size < hd.size);
+        assert!(uhd.total > hd.total);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn a_4k_far_over_target_still_loses_to_an_at_target_1080p() {
+        let bloated = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P2160, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(40), 20);
+        let hd = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P1080, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(8), 20);
+
+        assert!(bloated.total < hd.total);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn the_last_preferred_resolution_is_worth_nothing() {
+        let hd = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P1080, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(8), 20);
+        let uhd = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P2160, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(22), 20);
+
+        assert_eq!(hd.resolution, 0);
+        assert_eq!(
+            uhd.resolution,
+            i64::from(ScoreWeights::default().resolution_step)
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn every_step_up_the_preference_is_worth_the_same() {
+        let mut policy = policy();
+        policy.resolution_preference =
+            vec![Resolution::R2160p, Resolution::R1080p, Resolution::R720p];
+        let step = i64::from(policy.score_weights.resolution_step);
+        let at = |resolution| {
+            let claims = NameClaims {
+                resolution: Some(resolution),
+                ..NameClaims::default()
+            };
+            score(&policy, Candidate::PreGrab(&claims), gib(8), 0).resolution
+        };
+
+        assert_eq!(at(ClaimedResolution::P2160), 2 * step);
+        assert_eq!(at(ClaimedResolution::P1080), step);
+        assert_eq!(at(ClaimedResolution::P720), 0);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn an_unranked_resolution_scores_no_resolution_term() {
+        // 720p is not in the seeded preference, and an unclaimed resolution
+        // has said nothing at all. Neither is a penalty.
+        let unranked = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P720, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(4), 10);
+        let unclaimed = NameClaims {
+            source: Some(ClaimedSource::WebDl),
+            ..NameClaims::default()
+        };
+        let unclaimed = score(&policy(), Candidate::PreGrab(&unclaimed), gib(20), 10);
+
+        assert_eq!(unranked.resolution, 0);
+        assert_eq!(unclaimed.resolution, 0);
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn the_resolution_term_outweighs_the_tiebreakers() {
+        // A 1080p remux with every seeder in the world must not beat a 4K
+        // WEB-DL sitting at its own target.
+        let uhd = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P2160, ClaimedSource::WebDl, gib(22), 5);
+        let hd = scored_at(ClaimedResolution::P1080, ClaimedSource::Remux, gib(8), 4096);
+
+        assert!(hd.source > uhd.source);
+        assert!(hd.seeders > uhd.seeders);
+        assert!(uhd.total > hd.total);
+    }
 }

crates/arr-db/migrations/0015_policy_resolution_rank.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+-- §5.5 cross-resolution ranking, issue #113. The size term scores a release
+-- against the band for its own resolution, so it says nothing about how
+-- resolutions rank against each other: an at-target 1080p and an at-target
+-- 4K both score `size_at_target`, and a 4K a couple of gibibytes over target
+-- lost to a 1080p that was merely on target. `resolution_pref` being an
+-- ordered list already implies a preference; this is the weight that makes
+-- the scorer honour it.
+--
+-- The last entry of `resolution_pref` is worth nothing and each earlier one
+-- `resolution_step` points more. 300 is chosen against the seeded 4K band
+-- (target 22 GiB, 60 points per gibibyte over): five gibibytes of overshoot,
+-- so a 4K up to 27 GiB beats an at-target 1080p and a bloated 4K past that
+-- does not. Below target the same arithmetic asks a 4K to be within about
+-- four gibibytes of its target to win, which keeps an 8 GiB 4K that looks
+-- like mud from beating a good 1080p.
+UPDATE policies
+SET    score_weights = json_set(score_weights, '$.resolution_step', 300),
+       updated_at    = strftime('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%fZ', 'now');

crates/arr-db/src/lib.rs

@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ mod tests {
             assert!(score_weights.contains("size_at_target"), "{score_weights}");
             assert!(score_weights.contains("source_tier"), "{score_weights}");
             assert!(score_weights.contains("seeder_doubling"), "{score_weights}");
+            // §5.5: and the step that ranks resolutions against each other.
+            assert!(score_weights.contains("resolution_step"), "{score_weights}");
         }
     }
 

crates/arr-db/src/policy.rs

@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ impl PolicyColumns {
                 size_at_target: score_weights.size_at_target,
                 source_tier: score_weights.source_tier,
                 seeder_doubling: score_weights.seeder_doubling,
+                resolution_step: score_weights.resolution_step,
             },
         })
     }
@@ -340,6 +341,16 @@ struct ScoreWeightsJson {
     size_at_target: i32,
     source_tier: i32,
     seeder_doubling: i32,
+    /// Added in 0015. The column default written by 0004 predates it, so a
+    /// row inserted without the column would carry no resolution rank at
+    /// all; fall back to the engine's own default rather than silently
+    /// scoring every resolution the same.
+    #[serde(default = "default_resolution_step")]
+    resolution_step: i32,
+}
+
+fn default_resolution_step() -> i32 {
+    ScoreWeights::default().resolution_step
 }
 
 #[derive(Debug, Default, Deserialize)]
@@ -427,6 +438,36 @@ mod tests {
         assert_eq!(loaded.policy.score_weights.seeder_doubling, 1);
     }
 
+    /// §5.5, issue #113: the seeded rows carry a resolution rank, and a row
+    /// written before 0015 falls back to the engine's default rather than
+    /// ranking every resolution the same.
+    #[tokio::test]
+    async fn the_resolution_step_is_seeded_and_defaults_when_absent() {
+        let (_dir, db) = seeded().await;
+        let seeded_step = db
+            .movie_policy(1)
+            .await
+            .unwrap()
+            .expect("movie 1")
+            .policy
+            .score_weights
+            .resolution_step;
+        assert_eq!(seeded_step, 300);
+
+        sqlx::query(
+            r#"UPDATE policies SET score_weights = '{"size_at_target":500,"source_tier":10,"seeder_doubling":1}'"#,
+        )
+        .execute(db.pool())
+        .await
+        .unwrap();
+        let loaded = db.movie_policy(1).await.unwrap().expect("movie 1");
+
+        assert_eq!(
+            loaded.policy.score_weights.resolution_step,
+            ScoreWeights::default().resolution_step
+        );
+    }
+
     #[tokio::test]
     async fn per_title_overrides_ride_along() {
         let (_dir, db) = seeded().await;
@@ -456,7 +497,9 @@ mod tests {
                     .into(),
             resolution_pref: r#"["2160p"]"#.into(),
             source_weights: r#"{"WEB-DL":2}"#.into(),
-            score_weights: r#"{"size_at_target":2000,"source_tier":7,"seeder_doubling":11}"#.into(),
+            score_weights:
+                r#"{"size_at_target":2000,"source_tier":7,"seeder_doubling":11,"resolution_step":42}"#
+                    .into(),
         }
         .to_policy()
         .unwrap();
@@ -467,6 +510,7 @@ mod tests {
                 size_at_target: 2000,
                 source_tier: 7,
                 seeder_doubling: 11,
+                resolution_step: 42,
             }
         );
         assert_eq!(policy.source_weights[&Source::WebDl], 2);